Too Strict - turning it into a radlib hugbox and banning stuff based on personal opinion
%
(21 votes)
Too Lenient - turning it into socdems/groypers
%
(14 votes)
Too Inconsistent - Bans are for contradictory reasons and different lengths
%
(18 votes)
Rule 11 needs to be enforced & Mods are way too lenient
%
(2 votes)
vwobbly and muu are the core of abuse and apathetically disregard the userbase, a couple of others are a too strict on certain topics but are trivial in comparison. Recent relaxing of overmoderation has been a good thing.
%
(2 votes)
I've been ban for "spam" in the past by a mod with a username that only should up once and never again. remove inactive mods
%
(1 votes)
Advertising is defensible but I don't think mod team can deal with an influx of new posters.
%
(1 votes)
mods hate Anarchism more than they do multipolarista scum and it shows
%
(1 votes)
"Too strict in 2020-2022" then "Not strict enough during 2023" and "Inconsistent in 2024."
%
(1 votes)
ban more fascists like homophobes and transphobes
%
(6 votes)
Rule 11 goes completely unenforced, leading to low-effort shitposts to overtake the site
%
(1 votes)
rules need a rework and mods need to do something about reactionaries passing their ideas off as left wing along with casual racism, homophobia, and anti Semitism
%
(5 votes)
ban posters who shill reactionary opinions persistently. use common sense to figure out if someone is posting in good faith/if their post is possibly part of a productive discussion, or if they are just trolling/shilling/wrecking/stunlocked. don't rely on groupthink and ban posters just because posts are controversial and people clap back at them.
%
(1 votes)
mods are retarded pedophile demcels
%
(3 votes)
There is likely not enough moderation overall. Rules likely need an update too.
%
(13 votes)
The plan to advertise on 4chan will probably change the issue
%
(4 votes)
i don't care. mods are just retarded.
%
(1 votes)
whether a rule is enforced depends entirely upon whether the mods agree with the poster or not
%
(6 votes)
Too lenient too Inconsistent need more mods ads on 4chan is a stupid idea
%
(3 votes)
Not enough incel *** banned.
%
(1 votes)
ban rightoid ***
%
(1 votes)
all of the above
%
(3 votes)
It's fine
%
(5 votes)
Make a 420chan board
%
(2 votes)
Mods are liberal faggots
%
(2 votes)
mods are glowies
%
(6 votes)
shhhh
%
(2 votes)
all board rules are retarded and vague
%
(1 votes)
I think mods need to be way harder on pol and crypto-pol *** dressed up as leftism. Rules might need to be updated in order to do this, though.
%
(7 votes)
i joined around middle of '24. i may not have enough expiernce with this site but they have been adequate and i like you for the most part, infinetly better than 4chan (not much of a challenge tho). go with the plan (this is first im hearing about it tho) just be a 5% more strict with the new users and try advertising on different sites too, try youtube adds.
%
(1 votes)
Unban haz
%
(2 votes)
we need more stalinism, also ban all anarkiddiez and also anfem poster okay? kthxbye t. DDRAnonNr23694
%
(1 votes)
All mods are bastards
%
(0 votes)
I think moderation is fine for the most part. Just be more consistent, ban multipolarista trolls who mostly derail threads or shill right wing ideas (like the Sandinista poster) and PLEASE do not advertise on 4chan. How can you honestly think that is a good idea.
%
(0 votes)
all of the above + ban multipolarist capitalist apologia on sight
%
(3 votes)
(Other)
%
( votes)
A pie chart will be rendered here.
(Other)
%
( votes)
Too Strict - turning it into a radlib hugbox and banning stuff based on personal opinion
(Other)
14.89%
(21 votes)
Too Inconsistent - Bans are for contradictory reasons and different lengths
(Other)
12.77%
(18 votes)
Too Lenient - turning it into socdems/groypers
(Other)
9.93%
(14 votes)
There is likely not enough moderation overall. Rules likely need an update too.
(Other)
9.22%
(13 votes)
I think mods need to be way harder on pol and crypto-pol *** dressed up as leftism. Rules might need to be updated in order to do this, though.
(Other)
4.96%
(7 votes)
ban more fascists like homophobes and transphobes
(Other)
4.26%
(6 votes)
whether a rule is enforced depends entirely upon whether the mods agree with the poster or not
(Other)
4.26%
(6 votes)
mods are glowies
(Other)
4.26%
(6 votes)
rules need a rework and mods need to do something about reactionaries passing their ideas off as left wing along with casual racism, homophobia, and anti Semitism
(Other)
3.55%
(5 votes)
It's fine
(Other)
3.55%
(5 votes)
The plan to advertise on 4chan will probably change the issue
(Other)
2.84%
(4 votes)
mods are retarded pedophile demcels
(Other)
2.13%
(3 votes)
Too lenient too Inconsistent need more mods ads on 4chan is a stupid idea
(Other)
2.13%
(3 votes)
all of the above
(Other)
2.13%
(3 votes)
all of the above + ban multipolarist capitalist apologia on sight
(Other)
2.13%
(3 votes)
Rule 11 needs to be enforced & Mods are way too lenient
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
vwobbly and muu are the core of abuse and apathetically disregard the userbase, a couple of others are a too strict on certain topics but are trivial in comparison. Recent relaxing of overmoderation has been a good thing.
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
Make a 420chan board
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
Mods are liberal faggots
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
shhhh
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
Unban haz
(Other)
1.42%
(2 votes)
I've been ban for "spam" in the past by a mod with a username that only should up once and never again. remove inactive mods
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
Advertising is defensible but I don't think mod team can deal with an influx of new posters.
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
mods hate Anarchism more than they do multipolarista scum and it shows
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
"Too strict in 2020-2022" then "Not strict enough during 2023" and "Inconsistent in 2024."
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
Rule 11 goes completely unenforced, leading to low-effort shitposts to overtake the site
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
ban posters who shill reactionary opinions persistently. use common sense to figure out if someone is posting in good faith/if their post is possibly part of a productive discussion, or if they are just trolling/shilling/wrecking/stunlocked. don't rely on groupthink and ban posters just because posts are controversial and people clap back at them.
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
i don't care. mods are just retarded.
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
Not enough incel *** banned.
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
ban rightoid ***
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
all board rules are retarded and vague
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
i joined around middle of '24. i may not have enough expiernce with this site but they have been adequate and i like you for the most part, infinetly better than 4chan (not much of a challenge tho). go with the plan (this is first im hearing about it tho) just be a 5% more strict with the new users and try advertising on different sites too, try youtube adds.
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
we need more stalinism, also ban all anarkiddiez and also anfem poster okay? kthxbye t. DDRAnonNr23694
(Other)
0.71%
(1 votes)
All mods are bastards
(Other)
0%
(0 votes)
I think moderation is fine for the most part. Just be more consistent, ban multipolarista trolls who mostly derail threads or shill right wing ideas (like the Sandinista poster) and PLEASE do not advertise on 4chan. How can you honestly think that is a good idea.
(Other)
0%
(0 votes)
Total votes: 141(from 143 participants)
A pie chart will be rendered here.
Missing permissions
You do not have permission to see the results of this poll.
After the deadline you will be able to see the results here.